Schools' Relocation Map
Email to David Beatty, Herts County Council
View email reply (May 07) from David Beatty>
To: David Beatty
Leader, Hertfordshire County Council
|
5 April 2007 |
Dear Councillor Beatty,
I am writing to you as leader of Hertfordshire County Council regarding the article that was published in the Bishop's Stortford Herts & Essex Observer newspaper dated the 22nd of February 2007 relating to the proposed location of two new schools on Green Belt land off Whittington Way, Thorley, Bishop's Stortford.
For your information I am a resident of Thorley Park and live close by to Whittington Way and the proposed location of the two new schools. I am sure that you are well acquainted with the Inspectors Report from the public enquiry held last year on the elements of the East Herts District local plan which apply to Thorley and Bishop's Stortford. However, I am listing below a number of important points that were highlighted at the public inquiry meeting and in the subsequent Inspectors Report on this matter.
- There was no compelling financial case for meeting the new schools requirement in this way – not least because the cost of site acquisition had not been established.
- The reserved school site at Hadham Road, already in public ownership, is considered large enough to provide a school which would meet the long term requirement for additional places.
- There would be a loss of an important Green Belt site – the only one between the existing bypass and the built up area of Bishop’s Stortford. It would be unrealistic to expect the rest of the site to be preserved from development once a large part of it had been used for schools. Since the precedent for violating the Green Belt sanctuary would already have been established.
- There would be intolerable traffic congestion across Bishop's Stortford in general and Thorley Park in particular as a result of concentrating such a large school population on a single site, to the south of the town remote from the main public transport services.
- Relocating the two existing schools at Whittington Way would put further pressure on the town’s fragile infrastructure and increase demand for school places if the Hadham Road site and those existing sites vacated by the schools then were used for additional housing. Although the local plan does not provide for using all the sites in this way, the sponsors of the proposal would no doubt argue that such use was essential to help pay for their scheme.
As I understand it the Inspector found these arguments compelling and proposes in her report to direct East Herts District Council not to alter the Green Belt designation of the site, or to release the Hadham Road site for housing unless the need for school places can be met elsewhere.
Against this background I would be grateful if you would tell me on what authority has Hertfordshire County Council made a provision to spend £200,000 of tax payers money in next years budget for consultants to carry out a series of surveys on behalf of the two schools at Whittington Way. Surely, this prejudges the outcome of where the new school should be built and totally dismisses the other viable options, specifically the Hadham Road site.
Local communities across Bishop's Stortford appreciate that the town needs a new school to cater for future requirements, especially since the volume of residential dwellings continues to increase year on year. However, determining the location of a new secondary education provision is a strategic issue for Bishop's Stortford which will have a profound effect on the physical and social fabric of the town for decades to come. Therefore, the budget provision must be used to carry out a proper comparative study which evaluates all the options, this must include an indepth survery of all aspects of sustainability and all elements that will impact on congestion and transport. A detail cost benefit analysis must also be carried out for each option. Each option must also take into account the negative impact on the whole town and its local communities with respect to additional housing, transport, congestion, etc.
In addition, it is essential that the evidence should also be taken from the primary stakeholders of the town, which should include the Chamber of Commerce and the Civic Federation. Furthermore, a thorough in depth public consulation must be carried out with existing and future parents.
Finally, in view of the forthcoming district and local elections due to take place in early May I would appreciate an early response to the above mentioned points so that local communities can be properly informed of Hertfordshire County Councils position on this important matter.
Regards,
Richard Hannah
Chairman
Emailed reply from David Beatty, Leader of Herts County Council Top
To: Richard Hannah
Bishop's Stortford Civic Federation
|
4 May 2007 |
Dear Mr Hannah
Thank you for your e-mail of 5 April, concerning the proposal by the two single-sex foundation schools in Bishop's Stortford that they should seek to co-locate on a new site in Whittington Way. I stress that this is a school-led project, and that the relevant planning authority is East Herts District Council.
Dealing with your bullet points:
- The meaning of your first bullet is not entirely clear. The schools themselves are required by their own financial regulations to ensure that they achieve value-for-money in their projects. As far as Hertfordshire County Council is concerned, it would be most cost-effective to provide additional school places through the expansion of existing school(s) than though the creation of a new one but no existing school in Bishop's Stortford, on its existing site, is capable of expansion.
- The Hadham Road site is barely large enough to accommodate a five-form entry school, smaller than we would wish any new secondary school to be, so it cannot be considered an alternative site to the proposed Whittington Way site where an overall 12 FE school campus is envisaged, with room and facilities to expand further should this be necessary. The Hadham Road site is also poorly located, being opposite what is likely to be one of the main access points to the ASRs.
- The loss or otherwise of part of a green belt site, through agreement that there is an exceptional case to build a school(s) in it, is a matter for the Local Planning Authority, namely, EHDC.
- It is arguable that the traffic congestion would be lessened by moving one school from a congested part of the town centre near the railway station. Once again, this is a matter for the town planning process.
- If the existing school sites were to be used for housing which, as you say, the schools concerned and the County Council see as essential to fund the cost of the new school buildings, these windfalls would contribute to the Regional Spatial Strategy targets rather than being an addition to them. In other words, the pressure on infrastructure will come from new housing whether or not the schools relocate and is, again, a matter for the planning authority.
- The Inspector accepted the need for additional school places in Bishop's Stortford, but decided to leave the issue of use of the Whittington Way site to the normal planning process.
The County Council has decided to contribute £200,000 to the cost of the overall town planning process that the two schools are engaged in on the authority of Cabinet and full Council, because it is excited by the prospect of two brand new sets of school buildings in Bishop's Stortford providing first-rate education facilities for the town.
I might add that EHDC are equally enthusiastic about working with the County Council and the schools to develop the possibility of community-use leisure facilities on the site.
Finally, consultation will be carried out both by the schools, relating to their statutory proposal to move and through the town planning process.
Yours sincerely
David Beatty
Leader
Letter sent by BSCF in response to email (May 07) from David Beatty Top
Cllr Beatty
East Herts Council
Wallfields
Peg Lane
Hertford
|
8 June 2007 |
Proposed Schools at Whittington Way, Thorley, Bishop's Stortford
Thank you for your email dated 5th of May 2007 on the above subject. I have noted your comments and respond as follows.
We all agree that Bishop's Stortford requires additional schooling facilities to cater for the educational needs of future generations of our children. However, I must say that I do not agree with your other comments and assertions.
Finally, you mention that there is to be a consultation process; we trust that this will be all embracing, transparent and conducted in a thorough manner involving all the communities of Bishop's Stortford.
Yours Sincerely,
Richard Hannah
CHAIRMAN